Quanskill
📖 THEORY | 90 Minutes | Chapter 2 of 4

Chapter 2: Working with AI — CRAFT & Tools

A great prompt is a 30% productivity multiplier on the same AI tool. Master the CRAFT framework, learn the four-tier tool landscape, know when to reach for FPT.AI vs. ChatGPT vs. MISA, and walk away with a personal prompt library you'll use in week one.

🎯 Chapter Objectives

Chapter 1 gave you the what. Chapter 2 gives you the how. By the end of this chapter you will have a working prompt template you can reuse for almost any MPV task, and a clear decision framework for which AI tool to use when.

📌 Chapter 2 Learning Snapshot

1

CRAFT

Five letters that 5× the quality of any prompt — Context, Role, Action, Format, Target.

2

Tiers

Four-tier tool landscape: Foundation → Enterprise → Vertical → No-Code.

3

Decide

Four questions answer "which tool for which task" — including the data-sensitivity question.

2.1 From Question to Structured Brief — The Prompting Ladder

Most users never get past Level 1. Their AI outputs disappoint, they blame the tool, they stop using it. Climbing one rung up the ladder produces 5× better results from the same model.

Level 1 — Question

Prompt: "Write me a CAPA report."

Result: A generic CAPA template with placeholder text. You'll throw it away.

Level 2 — Instruction

Prompt: "Write me a CAPA report for a syringe barrel-crack defect found on Line 3 last Friday. About 1,800 affected units. In Vietnamese, formal tone."

Result: Usable first draft, but generic structure and may miss your QMS template fields.

Level 3 — CRAFT Brief

Prompt: Context: MPV (Medical Plastic Vietnam) makes disposable medical syringes per ISO 13485:2016. Last Friday (10 May 2026), Line 3 night shift produced ~1,800 units with hairline barrel cracks (incident #2026-051). Operator log says the cooling fan tripped twice during the shift. Role: You are a Regulatory Affairs analyst familiar with ISO 13485 CAPA structure. Action: Draft sections 1–6 of the CAPA report: (1) Description, (2) Immediate containment, (3) Root cause hypotheses, (4) Proposed corrective actions, (5) Proposed preventive actions, (6) Verification plan. Use MPV's standard CAPA SOP structure (sections numbered 1–6, each 2–4 sentences). Do NOT invent ISO clause numbers — flag any clause references for me to verify. Format: Vietnamese, formal QA register tone. Each section: heading + 2–4 sentences. Total length: about 400 words. Target: The QA Manager will review and approve. ISO 13485 auditor may read in 2027 audit.

Result: A near-ready draft. You verify the facts (especially regulatory references), polish 10% of the language, and it's signable. Typical time saving: 60–90 minutes per CAPA.

The pattern: Every step up the ladder costs you ~30 seconds more thinking — and saves ~30 minutes of rewriting. CRAFT is not bureaucracy; it's the highest-leverage discipline in your AI toolkit.

Quick Recap — Prompting Ladder

Level 1 Question — vague, generic Level 2 Instruction — usable first draft Level 3 CRAFT — near-ready 30 sec thinking → 30 min saved

2.2 The CRAFT Framework — Five Letters You'll Use Every Day

CRAFT is the simplest prompt structure that survives contact with real work. Memorise the letters. The order matters: each letter sets up what the AI needs to know before you tell it what to do.

C

Context

The background slide. Who is MPV, what is the situation, what are the constraints, what already happened. Without context, the AI invents context — and that's where hallucinations begin.

R

Role

Which hat should the AI wear? "Act as a Regulatory Affairs analyst." "Respond as a senior factory supervisor." Role pulls the right vocabulary, structure, and assumptions.

A

Action

The specific verb. Draft. Summarise. Translate. Classify. Compare. Recommend. One action per prompt — avoid "do everything" mega-prompts.

F

Format

The container. Table? Bullet list? Email? 200 words? Vietnamese? Markdown? Tell the AI the shape of the output you want, or it will guess — usually wrongly.

T

Target Audience

Who reads this? A factory operator with limited English needs different language than an ISO 13485 auditor. The AI calibrates tone, jargon, and depth to the target.

C — Context: The Background Slide

For an MPV prompt, your default context paragraph mentions: company (disposable medical devices, ISO 13485:2016), location (Tam Diep IZ, Ninh Binh), today's situation, any specific data the AI needs (dates, numbers, lines, people). Two to four sentences. If you find yourself writing more than 5 sentences of context, you're probably trying to do too much in one prompt — split into two.

R — Role: Which Hat Do You Want AI to Wear?

Roles unlock different writing styles, structures, and assumptions inside the AI. Pick the role that matches your reader. Useful MPV roles:

A — Action: The Specific Verb

The seven verbs that cover ~90% of MPV's daily AI use: Draft · Summarise · Classify · Translate · Compare · Recommend · Check. Use one per prompt. If you need two, run two prompts — the output of each will be sharper.

F — Format: The Container

Examples of useful format specifications:

T — Target Audience: Who Reads This?

"For an ISO 13485 auditor in our 2027 surveillance audit" produces very different language than "for the Line 3 night shift operators reading on their phones during break". Specify it. The AI will calibrate every word choice.

🖼️ What CRAFT Looks Like in a Real AI Chat

ChatGPT · MPV CAPA Draft
You (CRAFT prompt)
Context: MPV makes disposable syringes, ISO 13485:2016. Last Friday Line 3 night shift produced 1,800 units with hairline barrel cracks. Cooling fan tripped twice. · Role: ISO 13485 RA analyst. · Action: Draft sections 1–6 of CAPA. · Format: Vietnamese, ~400 words, 6 numbered sections. · Target: QA Manager + 2027 ISO auditor.
ChatGPT
[Returns a clean 6-section Vietnamese CAPA draft. Sections 3 and 4 reference one ISO clause — flagged with "[VERIFY clause 8.5.3]" as you instructed. Ready for QA review.]
You (review)
Open the actual ISO 13485:2016 PDF, verify clause 8.5.3 is the one for CAPA. Confirm. Polish 3–4 sentences. Sign and route.
Total time: ~12 minutes including verification. Previous method (writing from scratch): 90–120 minutes.

Quick Recap — CRAFT in 5 Letters

C — Context (background) R — Role (which hat) A — Action (one verb) F — Format (container) T — Target (audience)

2.3 Real CRAFT Prompts for MPV Departments

Four ready-to-use CRAFT prompts from four MPV departments. Copy, adapt, deploy. These are your starter prompt library for week one.

Finance — Board Commentary on Monthly Variance

CRAFT prompt: Context: MPV (Vietnamese disposable medical-device manufacturer). I'll paste this month's P&L variance table (revenue, COGS, gross margin, opex, EBITDA — actual vs budget vs prior month). Role: You are a cost accountant familiar with manufacturing P&L narratives. Action: Draft the variance commentary I'd put in the board pack. Use only the numbers I provide — do NOT invent figures. Where a number doesn't have an obvious cause in the data, write "(reason TBC, finance to investigate)". Format: 4 short paragraphs (Revenue · Gross Margin · Opex · EBITDA outlook). 250–300 words total. Plain professional tone. Target: CFO and 5 board members reading the pack on Saturday morning.

Procurement — Resin RFQ Comparison

CRAFT prompt: Context: MPV is sourcing 50 tonnes/month of medical-grade polypropylene resin. I'll paste three supplier quotes (price/kg, lead time, MOQ, payment terms, certifications, samples available). Role: You are an experienced procurement officer for medical-device manufacturing. Action: Compare the three quotes on price, total landed cost (estimate shipping), lead time, payment-term cash-flow impact, and risk (certifications, MOQ flexibility). Recommend which to shortlist and what to ask in the next round. Format: Comparison table (rows = suppliers, columns = the criteria above) + 3-sentence recommendation. Target: Procurement Manager and CFO; both read in <10 minutes.

Factory Operations — SOP Starter from Engineer's Notes

CRAFT prompt: Context: MPV Line 3 syringe assembly. I'll paste 12 bullet points from the maintenance engineer about a new cooling-fan inspection check we're adding. Role: You are a senior MPV factory supervisor writing an SOP for line operators. Action: Convert the bullets into a numbered SOP draft. Add a "frequency" line for each step. Flag anywhere I haven't given enough detail with "[CLARIFY: ...]". Format: Vietnamese, 8–12 numbered steps. Each step: action verb + object + frequency. Plus a top section with purpose, scope, responsible role, tools needed. Target: Line operators, mostly Vietnamese-only, reading the laminated SOP on the line. Reading level: secondary school.

Distribution — Delivery Delay Notification to a Hospital

CRAFT prompt: Context: MPV has a 5,000-syringe order to Bach Mai Hospital (Hanoi) due Friday. Resin shipment delay means we'll ship Monday — 3 working days late. Role: You are MPV's customer service representative. Action: Draft a professional Vietnamese email notifying the hospital procurement officer (Ms. Linh) of the delay. Explain cause briefly, give new shipping date, offer mitigation (partial shipment of in-stock items Thursday). Apologise sincerely without over-promising future performance. Format: Vietnamese email, 120–150 words, formal but warm tone. End with concrete next step and direct contact line. Target: Hospital procurement officer (Ms. Linh, formal address); CC: MPV sales manager.
Build YOUR prompt library: Save 5 CRAFT prompts you actually use this month in a dedicated note (OneNote, Notion, Google Doc, even Notepad). Reuse, refine, share with one colleague. This is the single highest-leverage habit in this course.

Quick Recap — Department Prompts

Finance — variance commentary Procurement — RFQ comparison Factory Ops — SOP from notes Distribution — delay notification Build YOUR library this week

2.4 Four Patterns That Multiply CRAFT

Once CRAFT is muscle memory, these four patterns lift quality further. Use them when the basic CRAFT prompt produces a 75% answer and you want a 95% answer.

1. Few-Shot Prompting — Give the AI Examples

Include 2–3 examples of the input→output pattern you want, then ask for the same pattern on a new input. Often the difference between an unusable and a usable output.

Pattern: "Classify each customer email into one of: DELIVERY · QUALITY · BILLING · SPEC_QUERY · OTHER. Example 1: 'Đơn hàng tuần này khi nào giao?' → DELIVERY Example 2: 'Lô vừa nhận có 3 ống bị nứt.' → QUALITY Example 3: 'Cho hỏi giá kim 23G hộp 100.' → SPEC_QUERY Now classify: 'Tôi cần xuất hóa đơn lại cho đơn hàng tháng 4.' → ?"

2. Chain-of-Thought — Ask AI to Think Step by Step

For analysis, comparison, or multi-step problems, add "think step by step before giving the final answer" or "show your reasoning". This forces the AI to lay out its logic — which both improves accuracy and makes errors visible to you.

3. Constrained Output — Lock the Shape

For automation pipelines, constrain to JSON / table / specific word count. Removes ambiguity downstream.

Example: "Respond ONLY with valid JSON in this shape: { complaint_id, category, urgency_1to5, suggested_owner }. No explanation, no markdown, no commentary."

4. Iterative Refinement — Conversation, Not Single-Shot

The first response is rarely the best. Use follow-ups: "Make it 30% shorter." "Drop section 3." "Rewrite section 4 in a warmer tone." "Now translate to Vietnamese for the operator handout." Treat AI as a junior writer you're editing in real time — not a vending machine.

Quick Recap — 4 Multipliers

Few-shot — show examples Chain-of-thought — show reasoning Constrained output — lock the shape Iterative — conversation, not single-shot

2.5 The Mental Map — Four Tiers of AI Tools

The 2026 AI tool landscape is overwhelming if you treat each product as unique. Group them into four tiers — then "which tool?" becomes "which tier?", a much smaller decision.

TierWhat it isExamples (2026)MPV typical use
1 · Foundation ModelsThe general-purpose LLM. You prompt directly. Highest flexibility, lowest setup cost.ChatGPT (OpenAI) · Claude (Anthropic) · Gemini (Google) · DeepSeekPhase 1: every employee uses one of these. Drafting, summarising, translation.
2 · Enterprise PlatformsFoundation models embedded into your existing productivity suite, with data residency and auth.Microsoft Copilot (M365) · Google Gemini for Workspace · Anthropic Claude TeamsPhase 2: org-wide rollout with SSO, audit logs, data-residency controls.
3 · Vertical AIPre-built for a specific industry / function. Less customisation, more out-of-box capability.MISA AMIS (Vietnamese SME ERP+AI) · Cognex / Keyence (industrial CV) · Lean Solutions (medical-device QMS+AI)Phase 2/3: specific pillars — CV inspection, QMS automation, ERP AI.
4 · No-Code & AgentsWorkflow tools that orchestrate the above. Drag-and-drop AI pipelines.Microsoft Power Automate · Zapier · n8n · Make · LangChain (developer)Phase 2: connect AI outputs to email, dashboards, ERP, SharePoint. Often the integration glue.

Quick Tool Guide — When to Reach for Which

📝 Daily writing & analysis

Tier 1: ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro (~$20/month/user). Universal default.

📧 Email + Office docs at scale

Tier 2: Microsoft Copilot in M365. Lives inside Outlook/Word/Excel.

🧾 Finance, expense, ERP

Tier 3: MISA AMIS — Vietnamese-built, VND pricing, integrated.

👁️ Defect detection on line

Tier 3: FPT.AI Vision API or VinAI for pilot; Cognex/Keyence for production.

🔀 Workflow + automation

Tier 4: Power Automate (Microsoft shop) or n8n (open-source).

🔬 Phase 3 custom build

Mix: Tier 1 API + Tier 4 orchestration; only if Tier 3 vertical doesn't exist.

Quick Recap — Tool Tiers

T1 Foundation — prompt directly T2 Enterprise — embedded in M365/Workspace T3 Vertical — industry-specific T4 No-code — orchestration

2.6 Domestic Alternatives — Often Better for VN Workflows

Don't default to American tools just because they're famous. For Vietnamese-language workflows, data residency, and VND-priced contracts, the Vietnamese stack often wins. The leadership team will ask about these — know them.

🇻🇳 FPT.AI & FPT AI Factory

Vision API, NLP, OCR, voice. FPT AI Factory (launched 2024) is Vietnam's first NVIDIA H100 sovereign-AI cluster. Built specifically so Vietnamese enterprises can run AI without sending data abroad. VND contracts, Vietnamese SLA, Hanoi/HCMC support.

🇻🇳 VinAI Research

VinGroup's lab. PhoGPT and PhoBERT are leading Vietnamese-language models — outperform GPT/Claude on Vietnamese-specific tasks (idioms, formal writing, legal text). Strong industrial CV pipeline relevant for MPV Pillar 1.

🇻🇳 MISA AMIS

Vietnam's leading SME ERP (accounting, HR, sales). AI features built in: invoice OCR, expense classification, sales-pipeline scoring. Already used across the Vietnamese SME segment MPV operates in. Often the lowest-friction AI adoption path.

🇻🇳 Viettel AI

Viettel's AI arm. Strong in Vietnamese voice, real-time transcription, OCR. Government-sector friendly — useful when the AI Law's "local presence" requirements bite. Bundled into Viettel telecom contracts MPV may already have.

The strategic read: For productivity (drafting, summarising, translating) → Tier 1 international models are fine. For regulated workflows (Pillar 4 compliance docs, employee personal data, customer contracts) → favour Vietnamese vendors with data residency or pair international models with desensitisation. Chapter 3 makes this operational.

Quick Recap — VN Alternatives

FPT.AI — vision, NLP, sovereign compute VinAI — Vietnamese LLMs MISA AMIS — ERP + AI Viettel AI — voice + government

2.7 The Decision Framework — Four Questions Before You Pick a Tool

Don't argue tool-by-tool. Run any AI-tool decision through these four questions, in this order. The answer falls out.

Q1 — Commodity or Differentiator?

Commodity capability (drafting an email, summarising a doc, translating): use whatever your team already uses. Don't waste a procurement cycle.
Differentiator capability (something that genuinely affects MPV's competitive position — a custom defect-detection model, a proprietary supplier-risk score): worth scoping carefully, possibly Phase 3 custom build.

Q2 — Data Sensitivity?

Data typeRecommendation
Public information, generic draftingAny Tier 1 model is fine
Internal MPV data with no PII, no IPTier 1 with company account; or Tier 2 enterprise plan
Employee PII, customer/hospital data, ISO 13485 recordsTier 2 enterprise (with DPA/SCC) OR Tier 3 Vietnamese vendor with data residency
Designs, IP, formulae, M&A, regulatory submissionsTier 3 Vietnamese vendor OR Tier 4 on-prem orchestration; never public free tier

Q3 — How Fast Do You Need It?

⚡ Days (Rent)

Subscribe to a Tier 1 model. ~500K VND/month/user. Productive in week one.

🛠️ Weeks (No-Code Build)

Tier 1 + Tier 4 (e.g. ChatGPT + Power Automate). 2–4 weeks to a working pilot.

📦 1–3 Months (Buy Vertical)

Tier 3 vendor (MISA, FPT.AI, Cognex). Includes vendor implementation.

🧪 3–9 Months (Phase 3 Custom)

Tier 1 API + Tier 4 orchestration, built by IT/engineering. Reserved for genuine differentiators only.

Q4 — Vendor Lock-in & Trust

Three questions to ask every vendor before signing:

MPV's Default Sequencing (recommended): Phase 1 → rent Tier 1 (ChatGPT/Claude) for all staff. Phase 2 → add Tier 2 (Microsoft Copilot) for org-wide rollout + 1–2 Tier 3 verticals for pillars. Phase 3 → 1–2 Phase 3 custom builds for genuine differentiators only.

Quick Recap — Decision Framework

Q1 Commodity or differentiator? Q2 Data sensitivity? Q3 How fast? Q4 Vendor trust?

2.8 The Rule of Thumb Before You Paste

The single most important safety habit in your AI life. Practice it until it's automatic.

🖼️ The 4-Question Check

Before pasting ANY content into a public AI tool, ask:
1. Personal data?
Names, IDs, salaries, medical records, hospital order data? → Stop. Use enterprise plan or desensitise.
2. MPV IP?
Designs, formulae, supplier prices, contracts? → Stop. Use enterprise plan only.
3. Regulated content?
ISO 13485 records, CAPAs, MOH submissions, FDA correspondence? → Stop. Verify enterprise data handling.
4. Would my manager mind?
If you'd hesitate to email this to a random vendor — don't paste it into a public AI tool either.
The shortcut: If you'd not paste it into a public website's contact form, don't paste it into a public AI chat. Chapter 3 turns this into a full "Do-Not-Paste List" with MPV-specific examples.

📝 Chapter 2 Summary — What You Now Own

The prompting ladder: Question → Instruction → CRAFT Brief — climb one rung, 5× the quality

CRAFT: Context · Role · Action · Format · Target — the five letters you'll use every day

Four MPV starter prompts: Finance variance · Procurement RFQ · Factory SOP · Distribution delay email

Four multipliers: Few-shot · Chain-of-thought · Constrained output · Iterative refinement

Four-tier tool map: Foundation · Enterprise · Vertical · No-Code/Agents

Four Vietnamese vendors: FPT.AI · VinAI · MISA AMIS · Viettel AI

Four-question decision framework: Commodity? Data sensitivity? How fast? Vendor trust?

Rule of Thumb Before You Paste: Personal data? IP? Regulated? Manager-OK?

🔬 Continue to Chapter 2 Lab →